Zendesk vs. Jira: Which do you need?

I used to work at a children’s shoe store, and we kept all our customer information on index cards (…yeah). So when a customer came into the store asking about their previous shoe size, naturally, we had lost their information and couldn’t help them. Needless to say, little Suzie didn’t get a new pair of shoes in her Easter basket, and we lost a sale. 

You may not be in the shoe biz, but the importance of quality customer service is pretty universal. If your company has an index card equivalent for organizing customer data and lending support, you’re in need of help desk software. But which one should you go with? 

Zendesk for Service and Jira Service Management are two of the most popular help desk solutions on the market. I tested both apps to see how their features compare and what teams they’re best for. Keep reading for my breakdown of Zendesk vs. Jira.

Zendesk vs. Jira at a glance

Both Zendesk and Jira offer ticket management solutions, but it’s not really fair to compare the two platforms apples to apples. Here’s why:

• Zendesk for Service is better suited for customer support teams that require a user-friendly ticketing solution.

• Jira Service Management is better positioned for IT support teams that will take advantage of its advanced IT service management (ITSM) features.

Having said that, there’s a lot of overlapping functionality, so I dove in to see how they compare. Here’s a quick comparison table, or you can keep reading for more details on my experiences with each platform.

Jira is better for IT support teams

Both tools offer a ticket management system, but Jira is much more than just a ticketing system. With other ITSM features like asset management, change management, and problem management, Jira is a better fit for IT support teams. 

That’s not to say Jira isn’t equipped to aid with other customer support issues. Jira offers multiple service management templates to solve different customer satisfaction issues, including ITSM, general service management for IT and business teams, customer service management, and plenty more. 

While the ITSM template has more advanced features for IT teams (obviously), the customer support template focuses solely on customer support features like ticket management, knowledge base, and reports. So Jira offers these customer service features, but Zendesk does them better (which I’ll get into in a bit). 

So what ITSM-specific features do you get with Jira? First up is the asset management feature. This allows IT teams to easily track assets (like computer equipment and software) and their relevant requests. You can keep track of all your equipment in one place and link issues to related objects. 

With the change management feature, you can do things like create change plans, assess risks, track deployment, and view changes in a calendar. From the Changes project, you can switch between priority views and quickly see the status of each change request—features that make the lives of IT teams much easier. 

It was smooth sailing navigating the change calendar. With project, status, and assignee filters (plus so many more), you can easily narrow your view to just the information you need. You also have multiple calendar view options: day, week, month, and list.

Jira also offers a problem management feature for ITSM. With this feature, you can group multiple incidents into one problem, so IT team members can identify trends and get to the root of the issue. 

If your company also uses Jira Software, you can check any recent releases there to help diagnose the problem. 

And it doesn’t end there. Jira’s automation options go beyond basic ticket management with additions like issue management triggers, DevOps triggers, and release management triggers. 

Technically, you could use Zendesk ticketing for ITSM. But it certainly isn’t built for it, and it’s lacking many ITSM-specific features (like asset tracking) that make Jira a better fit for IT teams.

Zendesk is better for external customer support teams

While Jira really shows off when it comes to ITSM, Zendesk has more to offer in terms of external customer support.

Both platforms allow agents to not only assist customers via chat but also set up a bot to automatically reply to customers to speed up workflows. However, Zendesk gets bonus points here for making these AI agents available at all pricing tiers, while Jira makes you upgrade to at least the Premium tier, which is over double the price of Zendesk Support Team.

Both also allow you to customize the flow of conversation your bot should lead customers through, determining what questions it should ask and what data to collect. You can set up automated triggers to program the bot to hand the customer off to the best agent for the job. 

While I don’t love the interface for setting up these automated triggers, since there aren’t any templated options and making your own involves a lot of dropdown boxes, the opportunities for what you could do with the chatbot are huge. Jira gets its own bonus point here for offering bot templates. (Zendesk comes stock with exactly two prebuilt options.)

Another customer support feature Zendesk does really well is its knowledge base. Zendesk allows you to add FAQs, community discussions, feature requests, and announcements. The interface for managing all of these sections is so straightforward that you definitely don’t need to be a pro at creating landing pages to configure the knowledge base. 

The Jira interface for managing your knowledge base isn’t as user-friendly or visual (though it does have a few moderately useful templates). Every page I went to edit opened in another, more confusing tab—not to mention, I couldn’t find an option to preview my base as the end user would see it. 

Zendesk also has a section in its knowledge base interface where agents can easily moderate any community discussions and filter spam—a feature I couldn’t find on Jira. Since Zendesk was built for customer support, it makes sense that it would have more nuanced customer-centric features like these.

Zendesk offers better reporting

Zendesk’s reporting is more robust than Jira’s. You can pull in data from multiple channels, including calls, chat, answer bot, and articles from your knowledge base. And within those channels, you can pull in any metric you could possibly need—and add columns, rows, and explosions (which let you show multiple charts side by side). Then you can visualize and customize your data however you see fit and even use built-in formulas or save your own custom formula for a specific metric.

Jira also has a reporting feature, but it’s not as easy to pull data from specific channels, and there aren’t nearly as many customization options as Zendesk.

Zendesk is easier to use for help desk beginners

Zendesk is a lot easier to navigate when you’re just getting started with the platform. It has a whole Get started tab with a rundown of all its features, complete with video guides. 

As you explore each feature, there are detailed pop-up boxes at each step and even a chatbot to help guide you through the platform. 

You get a different experience with Jira. While the guided tour popped up eventually, for some reason it wasn’t triggered as soon as I opened the dashboard, so I was flying by the seat of my pants for a while until it decided to start helping me out.

There’s also a world’s difference between navigating an open ticket in Zendesk vs. Jira. Take a look at what an open ticket in Jira looks like. I literally gasped when I opened it. 

There’s so much going on. Tabs on both sides, tabs above, tabs everywhere. Now, I’m not an IT professional, so on some level, this will probably always be a little overwhelming to me. But the number of options you have for working through a ticket might make it hard to find what you need quickly.

Compare that to this open ticket in Zendesk, which navigated me through all the fields with multiple pop-ups when I first launched the sample ticket. 

While there are fewer advanced options, the interface is cleaner and doesn’t have me shaking in my boots trying to navigate it. Sure, there isn’t an option to link affected hardware, but it’s a lot easier to find crucial elements like the ticket status dropdown box. For customer support, it makes a lot more sense.

Jira’s features also aren’t all housed within Jira. For example, in order to manage alerts, you’re navigated to Opsgenie, a totally separate Atlassian app. It felt like a game of musical chairs trying to use the platform. Again, this is par for the course for an IT tech stack, but if you’re just trying to use it for customer support, it’s a lot.

I’m sure the learning curve dissipates as you get more familiar with Jira, but I picture the setup process being a bit of a headache for customer support professionals who just want to jump into using the ticketing system.

Jira is loaded with automation and team connection features

So what are all these extra features that make Jira so much more extensive than Zendesk?

Automation

Zendesk’s automation capabilities pale in comparison to Jira’s. There are tons of templates for creating new automation rules within Jira. For instance, you can create a rule that automatically assigns issues to agents based on workload capacity, or make a rule that reopens a closed request if a customer leaves another comment on it. 

When you compare those options to Zendesk’s automation, there’s much to be desired. Unlike other Zendesk features, its automation capabilities are much more self-serve: there aren’t pre-made templates to get you started.

Creating your own automation isn’t the most user-friendly process, either. Unlike Jira’s templates that explain exactly what the automation or trigger will do, Zendesk just hands you a bunch of dropdown options in each category that you have to sort through to MacGyver your own automation.

Create and connect teams

What I found really cool about Jira was the ability to add and manage multiple teams. You can sort of do this with Zendesk, but it’s not as advanced (more on that in a minute). With Jira, you can create an IT team, a dev team, a customer support team, and more depending on your needs. 

From there, you can click into your different groups to see team activity and project statuses, and add context about why and where that team exists. Granted, it makes sense to have interconnected IT and customer support teams in a customer support solution with an IT focus, but the functionality does open a lot of doors that Zendesk leaves closed. 

You can create a group in Zendesk, but it’s more meant for assigning team members with certain expertise to relevant tickets, not cross-functional teams. When you click into these groups, the only information you can view is what open tickets are assigned to that group and what team members belong to that group. 

And like I mentioned earlier, Jira has multiple project templates you can use depending on what you need. That’s super useful on its own, but what’s even better is that you can create multiple projects, like an ITSM project and a customer service project, and switch between them. 

While you probably don’t need every template Jira offers, you could separate the customer support and IT teams into different projects, so everyone gets what they need out of their project space. With Zendesk, you can create different views, but that’s strictly for viewing tickets, so it’s not really comparable. 

Again, limited views may do the trick if you’re only focused on general customer support issues. But if you need to work with multiple teams to solve a technical issue, Zendesk may not cut it. 

Jira has richer AI features, but Zendesk holds its own

While AI can’t 100% replace great service agents, what it can do is become their new best friend. Zendesk and Jira both make that possible, but in different ways (aside from their already-discussed AI chatbots).

Zendesk’s artificial intelligence tools fall almost entirely in the category of integrated generative AI features. But if you’re sensing a theme here that these features aren’t free, you’ve clearly been paying attention. Advanced AI add-on users get fun perks like the ability to auto-generate responses, summarize messages, rephrase written messages, and answer queries without having to type a word.

Users without the bonus AI add-on still get a taste of the full AI menu. Within support tickets, agents can get AI-powered macro suggestions, so they can potentially resolve tickets in a matter of clicks.

Jira users, on the other hand, get the power of Atlassian Intelligence, a robustly developed suite of AI tools. This smart suite is trained by both Atlassian’s internal models and your own team’s unique knowledge base, tailoring its language models to how your team operates.

Like Zendesk, Jira’s generative AI is built right into the ticketing platform. You can automatically summarize tickets to pass along to stakeholders, generate responses, edit your text, change your tone, and even write whole articles for your knowledge base. 

But Jira’s AI goes beyond just generating and doctoring text. Atlassian Intelligence has a handy feature for suggesting groups of similar request and incident types, so you can manage them more efficiently. It can also predict assignments and mentions based on past assignments and communication patterns.

Jira also doesn’t make its AI free. You’ll have to pay up for at least a Premium package if you want to smarten up your service processes with Atlassian Intelligence.

Zendesk vs. Jira: Which should you choose?

It really comes down to what you need out of the tool. If you’re just looking for a customer support ticketing system, you’ll be better off sticking to Zendesk. Jira is going to be a lot for customer support professionals to navigate, and you likely won’t get your money’s worth from all the extra ITSM features. 

Zendesk does many general support features better than Jira, like knowledge bases and reporting. If these features are integral to your support workflows and if you need an easy-to-use interface to manage them, Zendesk is going to be a better option for you.

But if you would take advantage of all the ITSM features Jira offers and already use other Jira software, it’s a no-brainer to use Jira Service Management for your customer and IT support needs, too. 

All in all, Zendesk is more like a first line of defense for customer support issues, while Jira can dig into creating permanent fixes for issues. If you only need to resolve basic customer or employee issues, Jira might be more than you need.

Integrating Zendesk and Jira

Plot twist: the two apps also natively integrate, and you can use them together.

For example, if you use Jira for internal needs and Zendesk for external customer support, you could send a Zendesk ticket over to Jira to create an issue for development teams to work on. That action can even be automated, so dev team members are automatically assigned issues, and when they close out the issue, all the linked tickets in Zendesk also automatically close. 

Agents on Zendesk and developers and IT professionals on Jira can easily exchange comments between the platforms as well, so lines of communication stay open on both sides while issues are being resolved. Additionally, you can connect multiple customer service portals to projects within Jira. Because each system has its own long list of APIs, there’s a lot you can do to sync information between the two platforms and customize processes to fit your needs. 

And whether you go with Zendesk or Jira, Zapier offers thousands of integrations for both platforms, so you can also connect them to the rest of your tech stack. Learn more about automating Zendesk and Jira, or get started with one of these pre-made templates:

Zendesk vs. Jira Service Management FAQ

Still have more questions about Zendesk and Jira? Check out the answers to these frequently asked questions below.

What is the difference between Zendesk and Jira?

While Zendesk and Jira can be used relatively interchangeably, Jira is designed as more of an ITSM tool, while Zendesk is more of a customer support tool. Either application can be used for the other’s uses, but depending on your needs, one should have more utility than the other.

Does Jira have a ticketing system?

Yes, Jira Service Management can be used as a ticketing system. Customer support and IT professionals can manage both customer and employee tickets within the platform. 

Is Zendesk a CRM or SaaS?

Zendesk for Service is a SaaS product that provides customer support tools. Zendesk for Service shouldn’t be confused with Zendesk for Sales (AKA Zendesk Sell), which is a CRM.

Related reading:

This article was originally published in May 2023. The most recent update, with contributions from Bryce Emley, was in May 2024.